I know how important RPM is to the Fedora Project, but it breaksĮverything downstream and we'd be better off using DPKG as we should Under that license may be included in Fedora (including EPEL and COPRs). We have updated our 'Bad License' list to include SSPLv1. It is also worth nothing that while there is a draft for a 'v2' of the SSPL:ī) It is not in use anywhere at this time (as far as we know).Ĭ) The intent of the v2 draft text is not changed from the v1 license To consider the SSPL to be 'Free' or 'Open Source'Ĭauses that shadow to be cast across all other licenses in the FOSSĮcosystem, even though none of them carry that risk. It is the belief of Fedora that the SSPL is intentionally crafted to beĪggressively discriminatory towards a specific class of users.Īdditionally, it seems clear that the intent of the license author is toĬause Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt towards commercial users of software V1 (SSPL) is not a Free Software License. Please join #fedora-admin in or respond to this email toĪfter review, Fedora has determined that the Server Side Public License The additional time is for some further tuning if To convert UTC to your local time, take a look atįinal migration step for new cvs server.
There will be an outage starting at 01:00 UTC, which will last
